Knut, the Baby Polar Bear
There is a controversy brewing in Germany about whether Knut, a baby polar bear, should be allowed to live after he was abandoned by his mother. Ironically, the animal activists were the ones advocating the cub be killed, reasoning that he was better off dead than raised by humans. What do you think of their reasoning, and what do you think of Knut?
Categories: Uncategorized
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:46 pm
ARE YOU KIDDING ME???? Since when is it better to die than live when you are perfectly healthy? Just becuase him living with a human was maybe not “natures intended way” doesnt make it wrong. We dont just let human kids die whose parents dont want them. We find someone who will help them grow. I think the man who changed his life and moved in to save this bear deserves a medal – NOT scrutiny – get a life people who disagree!
March 23rd, 2007 at 5:01 pm
I agree with Jen. Knut’s a zoo animal. Why go out and capture a wild polar bear when there is one right there available for any zoo that needs one? With the polar ice caps melting, he’s probably a member of an endangered species. He’d never survive in the wild at this point, but who cares? The people that think he ought to be murdered probably also think that all zoos should be closed and all the animals either turned loose or “euthanized.” Shame on them. The animal “rights” activists should concentrate their efforts on smelly cow milk and meat factories. (I’m becoming a vegetarian) Knut has rights, too. These activists are giving themselves a bad name.
March 23rd, 2007 at 8:21 pm
I think it’s Wonderful what the zookeeper is doing to keep this precious little guy alive. It isn’t his fault his mother doesn’t have the proper “maternal instincts” to care for him, and he certainly should NOT have to die. It isn’t like people went searching to domesticate Knut; they’ve simply saved his life.
I wish I could help with him! He’s beautiful.
March 25th, 2007 at 6:08 am
Is that man really looking out for this polar bear’s “rights” when he says the bear ought to be killed?? Ridiculous.
March 28th, 2007 at 3:37 am
No animal should be destroyed at infancy if it is healthy. Especially so if it a species that we as human beings have on display at zoos worldwide. In Knut’s situation he will be one of a few polar bears living over the span of the next few decades if the global warming trend keeps up. We need to remind ourselves that many of the daily conveniences we partake in results from the quiet destruction and or removel of the animals in their natural habitats. It is not uncommon for me to see wild hare’s, and even two days ago, a coyote as I drove to work near Water Street and Boulder Highway. If we are taking away the natural environments of these creatures whose purpose is to maintain equilibrium in nature, then it is our responsiblity to care for them when their environment is gone due to our carelessness. Knut represents one of the many highly recognized species of this world. It would be a shame and disgrace to quiet the life of this gift from nature. Sometimes our best lessons of dealing with nature come from the animal kingdom. Maybe we should listen more often.
March 29th, 2007 at 6:28 am
This falls under the “It there problem catagory” NEXT
May 9th, 2007 at 6:43 am
The Berlin Zoo’s Cute Knut is bringing attention to the plight of endangered species as well as dwindling habitats. He is also a breathtakingly beautiful, yet cuddly and adorable little fellow who is bringing joy to millions of people around the world. May our precious Cute Knut enjoy a long, healthy and happy life.
January 3rd, 2008 at 12:55 pm
I think Knut has rights just like all of the rest of the animals. I read a book about him called Knut The Cub that Changed the world. I suggest you read it because some of you have your facts mixed up. Knuts brother died while the zoo keeper was trying to take care of both of them. The zoo keeper said Knut was like family. I also agree with Jen!